Medjugorje
For any that don’t know Medjugorje is a small village in Bosnia where
the Blessed Virgin Mary has allegedly
been appearing over the past 25 years with a total of over 35,000 individual
apparitions and messages. Millions of people have visited this place (most of
whom probably against the Church’s strict teaching, although most likely
without realising it).
I’ve written this blog to discuss the Church’s position on Medjugorje
and how the faithful should react to it according to the Church’s
teachings - if there are errors please correct me and I will be more than happy
to make any necessary changes.
So is the Virgin Mary really appearing at Medjugoje?
Perhaps a little disappointing to hear but the answer today is maybe yes, maybe no. As faithful Catholics it is not our job to judge the worthiness of apparitions since only the Church has this authority.
Therefore those who believe it ardently and those who have large doubts
should both do so with care, particularly in how they present the alleged
apparitions to other. Those who believe it should NOT preach it as though it
were a truth, for example they should make clear that the
"apparitions" have not been verified by the Church, and in the future
should be prepared to humbly reject their own private view should the Church
condemn the apparitions at some point in the future. Conversely, those who do
not believe in the alleged apparitions should also be open to the Church’s
authority on the matter. Although at no point in the future will anybody ever be
required to actually believe the apparitions since the Church can only declare
that apparitions are “worthy of belief” and as such can never be
declared as Dogma but rather fall under the category of private revelation. Examples of apparitions deemed worthy of belief include Fatima, Lourdes and Knock.
Are Catholics allowed to make pilgrimages to Medjugorje?
Yes and no, it would depend on what you mean by pilgrimage. Any Catholic is free to make a pilgrimage to any Catholic parish in the world and therefore Catholics are free to travel to Medjugorje. According to the Church a pilgrimage can be made to Medjugorje in the same way as you would take a pilgrimage to your own local Church, another Church in your own city or any other city for that matter – in the eyes of the Church there is nothing “special” about Medjugorje, it is simply a parish like any other and Catholics are free to visit.
Yes and no, it would depend on what you mean by pilgrimage. Any Catholic is free to make a pilgrimage to any Catholic parish in the world and therefore Catholics are free to travel to Medjugorje. According to the Church a pilgrimage can be made to Medjugorje in the same way as you would take a pilgrimage to your own local Church, another Church in your own city or any other city for that matter – in the eyes of the Church there is nothing “special” about Medjugorje, it is simply a parish like any other and Catholics are free to visit.
Whilst Catholics are free to travel to any parish this free however
comes with certain conditions so as not to place our own authority on these
matters above the Church.
1) First of all, since the Church hasn’t made a decision on the alleged
apparitions no pilgrimage can be organised at a parish or diocesis level and can only be of a
private nature. This means that Medjugorje should never be mentioned or
promoted in an official way and as such should never be mentioned during homilies, the Mass etc. to do so would be a grave disobedience against the Church.
2) Any pilgrimage made to Medjugorje cannot be made should it be an affirmation that the
Virgin Mary is indeed appearing there as the Church has not made a decision on the events and we do not have the authority to declare it worthy of belief, only
Holy Mother Church does. In the same vain it is also worth nothing that a pilgrimage cannot be made to investigate and see if it is indeed true
or not, again we do not have this authority.
3) The journey should only be based on prayer and the Sacraments and be
unrelated to the alleged private apparitions that are taking place – making a
pilgrimage on the basis of the Virgin appearing is not allowed if your visit is an affirmation that she is appearing. Doing this can cause great confusion within the Church and can cause divisions among the faithful.
I’ve already booked my trip, what should I do?
Go but with great caution and not allow yourself to be swept up by
events there. Certainly you’ll encounter a great number of believers there,
maybe some with great conversion stories or possible miracles, but remember
that this doesn’t prove there is any supernatural Marian related activity (we
should remember that even the devil himself can perform miracles).
In any case the place is holy because the sacraments are celebrated
there with frequency. Before departing read up on the issues, read the local
Bishop’s pronouncements (links below) regarding these matters and just be on
your guard reminding yourself of the Church’s authority on determining the
events. Go and enjoy your trip, pray, be open to the Lord, but remember the
rules that the Church has put in place regarding pilgrimages and adhere to
them. They are there for a reason.
The Bishop said “Therefore I responsibly call upon those who claim
themselves to be “seers”, as well as those persons behind the “messages”, to
demonstrate ecclesiastical obedience and to cease with these public
manifestations and messages in this parish. In this fashion they shall show
their necessary adherence to the Church, by neither placing private
“apparitions” nor private sayings before the official position of the
Church.” And this is how we should act – with obedience to the Church
authorities and remember that our allegiance will always be with Holy Mother
Church and the local Ordinary above any seer or alleged private apparition.
How should we respond to firm believers?
With charity and love. They may have indeed had a great conversion to
Christ and we should give thanks for this. However if someone preaches the
apparition as a fact, that it must be believed or possibly even that it has
been approved by the Church (or certainly will be in the future), simply point out that as
Catholics we believe that only the Church has the authority to declare whether
the apparitions are worthy of believe and it is not their place to decide this.
Remind them too that as such they should not preach that the Virgin is
appearing there as though it were a truth and that they too should be open to the Church’s
final decision and judgement on the matter on the “supernatural” developments.
This of course, also applies to any firm non-believers that you may encounter,
whom are also numerous.
Do conversions and good fruits mean that Mary really is appearing?
The majority of people that have gone to the place that I know have come back strengthened in their faith, reporting an atmosphere of peace there which they haven’t experienced before. Praise God that their faith has been strengthened! Any step towards God is a great thing. It should be noted that a “feeling” or even a strong conversion is no evidence however that the Virgin is appearing. History tells us as much. We have seen similar things in Garabanchel and Palmar de Troya over the past 40 years and both of these places whilst not condemned have been declared as having “nothing supernatural”. Indeed in the latter example there were huge conversions which unfortunately ended with someone declaring himself the Pope; a disaster for the Church and all those involved which causes a great loss of faith. With this in mind we should all be wary of events at Medjugorje, and not presume that because there are conversions (even miracles – although none have been proven) that this constitutes proof of the apparition.
How should Catholics respond to the messages of the Medjugorje?
Again with great caution since the Church has not made any official
pronouncement. It should be noted that no private revelation is ever part of
the deposit of faith; it can only help one to lead a more Christian life. There
has been no new revelation since the death of the last Apostle and as such the
messages of Medjugorje (or any other private revelation) do not add to what
Catholics are required to believe. The messages of Medjugorje should be read
with caution and never above the doctrine of Holy Mother Church which must
always take precedent over personal belief and feelings. If a message of
Medjugorje conforms to the Church’s teaching then it is fine, if it goes
against the Church’s teaching it should be discarded as heresy. It should also
be noted that conformity to the Church’s teaching in some messages in no way
verifies the apparitions.
As Catholics we should also be cautious of the huge publicity train that comes from Medjugorje and as there are many half truths and falsehoods that have been told. A perfect example of this would be the "messages", "comments" and "special blessings" from the Pope´s that have never been verified by the Vatican. Their origins are unknown.
As Catholics we should also be cautious of the huge publicity train that comes from Medjugorje and as there are many half truths and falsehoods that have been told. A perfect example of this would be the "messages", "comments" and "special blessings" from the Pope´s that have never been verified by the Vatican. Their origins are unknown.
Conclusion
As Catholic, faithful to Holy Mother Church, we must proceed as
Catholics with great caution regarding Medjugorje, especially since both
Bishops (Zanic and Peric) under whose control falls Medjugorje have rejected the alleged
apparitions since they were claimed to have begun.
Whether you believe or not they should be humble with regard to the Church’s pronouncement and we must always remember that it is not our place to judge these alleged apparitions and for believers especially not to place their judgement above that of the Church.e
Whether you believe or not they should be humble with regard to the Church’s pronouncement and we must always remember that it is not our place to judge these alleged apparitions and for believers especially not to place their judgement above that of the Church.e
Statement by the Bishop regarding the events at Medjugorje:
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"Obviously you side toward the naysayers - if the apparitions are real (which I firmly believe they are), and Mary's comes, she said sent by God and her Son, people who ignore it are disobeying God" - This is completely false. No private revelation is Dogma and should never be considered as such. Christians are only required to believe what was revealed by Jesus and that revelation has finished. The Church has only ever declared apparitions as "worthy of belief" and to say that by not believing we are disobeying God is simply scaremonegering of the worst kind...
Delete"so all of your platitudes about "oh, those people who go there, they grow spititually blah blah blah". You completely minimize miraculous occurrences, as if you know what people have experienced, seen etc. when you weren't even there. No offense, but your article and reasoning is very weak and obviously biased" - I haven´t argued once in this blog for or against the apparition, that is not my job.
You can never disobey God by being obedient to the competent authority residing in His Church. To do so would be the same as the Pius X organization which refuses to recognize Vatican II. In other words, they believe that the Holy Spirit no longer resides with the Bishops.
DeleteYou are free to believe or not believe that an event is occurring. The bottom line is that we are saved through the Life, Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. His teaching authority He left to HIS Apostles. And the succession has remained unbroken. We are made holy through our life in Christ and have become children of God through Baptism. Likewise, He has indeed given to us His Spirit. Acceptance or rejection of His Gospel is what we will be judged on. How have we lived it.
Again, when the final decision on a universal level has not yet been made, prudence dictates that we should listen to those local authorities who have been established as the protectors of the flock.
I see a lot of fear-based reasoning in your article. Of course as Catholics we are to follow the doctrines of the Church. In the case of private revelation, however, there is no obligation to believe or not to believe. Many Catholics do not believe in the events at Fatima or Lourdes or Guadeloupe even though those apparitions are approved. Even the Bishop of Mostar does not believe in Marian apparitions of any kind, which clearly explains why he holds this same position on Medjugorje and why he is not part of the current commission to evaluate Medjugorje. You negate the fact that we have the ability, through the Holy Spirit, to discern for ourselves in cases where the Church has no position. Will there be disagreement? Yes. Disagreement on matters like this does not tear the Church apart but is the basis for dialogue and understanding. It is how we handle disagreement that is important. When it comes to Medjugorje, I think I will continue to follow the thoughts and admonition of Pope John Paul II, Mother Teresa, Cardinal Schonborn and visionary Lucia of Fatima.
ReplyDeleteHi Timothy,
Delete"Even the Bishop of Mostar does not believe in Marian apparitions of any kind, which clearly explains why he holds this same position on Medjugorje and why he is not part of the current commission to evaluate Medjugorje" - can you back this up? I´m almost 100% sure that he is actually a very Marian Bishop and has visited Lourdes & Fatima, certainly his predecssor did. That he is anti-Marian apparition seems to be something found only in the pro-Medjugorje "press". But to say that is is because of this that he is not part of the commission is completely false.
"I think I will continue to follow the thoughts and admonition of Pope John Paul II, Mother Teresa, Cardinal Schonborn and visionary Lucia of Fatima" - There have never been any verified statements made by John Paul II regarding Medjugorje and the sources of those statements and gestures ("big blessings" - "smiles" at the mention of the name etc.) are completely unknown. Indeed Pope John Paul II always respected the views of the local ordinary and despite visiting the area, he never once visited or even mentioned Medjugorje whilst there - he only mentioned an actual Marian Shrine that exists.
"Yes. Disagreement on matters like this does not tear the Church apart but is the basis for dialogue and understanding. It is how we handle disagreement that is important" - I agree. I just hope that once the Holy Spirit guides the Church in Her decision that people will follow Mother Church rather than their own personal thoughts.
"I see a lot of fear-based reasoning in your article" - I don´t know what you mean by this.
Deletehttp://medjugorje1.blogspot.ca/
ReplyDelete